Back to the Map Room
Study 2025 · PLOS ONE

Curiosity across the adult lifespan

Whatley, Murayama, Sakaki & Castel — Age-related differences in state and trait curiosity


What's it about?

The study pulls apart two forms of curiosity and tracks how each one moves across a lifetime. Trait curiosity — the stable disposition, being open to the new in general — falls with age. State curiosity — the situational prickle of wanting one specific answer — climbs. That those two lines run in opposite directions is the core find. It shows that curiosity and age aren't a simple either-or.

How is it measured?

A lifespan sample: 1,218 adults between 20 and 84 (Amazon Mechanical Turk, USA). Trait curiosity was measured with the Epistemic Curiosity Scale — ten self-report items ("I enjoy exploring new ideas" and the like). State curiosity was captured through 63 randomly drawn trivia questions: participants rated, on a scale of 1–10, how curious they were about each answer — before it was shown. Analysis ran through multiple regression and mixed-effects models, controlling for education, income, gender and ethnicity.

So what follows?

Curiosity isn't one single thing that rises or falls evenly. Older adults grow choosier, not blanket-less-curious. Their richer prior knowledge produces sharper gaps — and so more intense situational curiosity wherever something catches. For professional development that means: broad offerings with no point of contact waste exactly the potential this group brings. Not more material, but better hooks. State curiosity then shows up on its own.

Opposing trajectories across the lifespan
Trait curiosity
↘ falls
State curiosity
↗ climbs
age 20 age 84 →
Related card Gruber, Gelman & Ranganath (2014) How curiosity changes memory — the neuroscientific evidence
Full citation

Whatley MC, Murayama K, Sakaki M, Castel AD (2025). Curiosity across the adult lifespan: Age-related differences in state and trait curiosity. PLOS ONE, 20(5): e0320600. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0320600